2025-10-13 – Weekly Civil Engineering News : Synchro vs. VISSIM: What's your pick?

Last week in the Civil Engineering forum saw vibrant discussions around software tools and practical career advice. A key theme was technology in transportation planning, with a lively debate on using Synchro vs. VISSIM for corridor retiming. Members also shared insights on transitioning from passing the FE exam to landing a first civil engineering role, highlighting the challenges and opportunities in the job market. Additionally, conversations around project management tools and modernizing fieldwork with technology were prominent.


This Week’s Hot Topics

Synchro or VISSIM for corridor retiming
This discussion is buzzing with professionals weighing the pros and cons of these two popular software choices for traffic management. It’s a great peek into how different tools can impact project efficiency and accuracy.
Read more here

2025-10-10 – Weekly Civil Engineering Jobs: Remote roles in high demand!
With the shift towards remote work, there’s a surge in demand for civil engineers who can adapt to virtual environments. This thread explores the nuances of remote roles in the industry.
Read more here

Gantt chart vs the zoning calendar
This is an engaging comparison for those interested in project scheduling. The thread discusses the effectiveness of Gantt charts versus zoning calendars in keeping complex projects on track.
Read more here

Cold nights draining our LoRa nodes
A technical challenge many in the field face, this thread explores how cold weather impacts LoRa sensors and potential solutions to mitigate these effects.
Read more here

Passed FE, searching for first civil role
A great read for recent graduates, this discussion centers on strategies to secure that first job post-exam, with community members sharing personal experiences and advice.
Read more here

What finally replaced my field notebook
The conversation here highlights the transition to digital tools, with members sharing their experiences of replacing traditional field notebooks with modern tech solutions.
Read more here

Rigid vs semi-rigid diaphragms in ETABS on irregular floors
For structural engineers, this thread dives into the complexities of diaphragm design, particularly in structures with irregular floor plans, offering insights into best practices.
Read more here

FAQ/Guidelines
Essential reading for newcomers to the forum, this post outlines the basic guidelines and frequently asked questions to help you get started smoothly.
Read more here

Admin Guide: Getting Started
A practical guide for administrators, offering step-by-step instructions to navigate the backend of the forum effectively.
Read more here

Considering a Career in Civil Engineering? Here’s What You Need to Know!
This thread is a comprehensive guide for anyone contemplating a career in the field, touching on essential qualifications, skills, and industry expectations.
Read more here


Wishing you a productive week ahead. Stay engaged and keep contributing to our community’s growth.

1 Like

, for β€œcorridor retiming” I start in Synchro for quick HCM checks and coordination, then only jump to VISSIM if spillback, bus stops, or lane drops are killing it. One concrete step: build/optimize in Synchro and use VISSIM’s Synchro import to carry timings and geometry so you’re not rebuilding from scratch. What’s pushing you to VISSIM here β€” stakeholder animation needs or actual queuing you can’t capture?

β€Œβ β€β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ β€Œβ€β€‹β β€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ β€‹β€‹β€Œβ€β β€‹β€Œβ β€β€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€Œβ€‹β€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β β€Œβ€‹β€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€Œβ β€Œβ€β€β€Œβ€Œβ€β€‹β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€‹β β€Œβ€β β€‹β€Œβ€β€‹β β€Œβ β€‹β β€Œβ€β€‹β€Œβ€Œβ β€‹β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€β€‹β β€Œβ€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€‹β€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β β€Œβ€‹β€‹

On corridors with short turn bays, I keep it in Synchro until observed 95th‑percentile queues touch the through lane; when I jump to VISSIM, I import the Synchro file but lock field‑measured sat flows and lost times so microsim randomness doesn’t mask a bad plan. @ayoung if bus stops are the pain point, are you using dwell time distributions with headway‑based arrivals, or just fixed dwells?

β€Œβ β€β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ β€Œβ€β€‹β β€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ β€‹β€‹β€Œβ€β β€‹β€Œβ β€β€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€Œβ€‹β€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β β€Œβ€‹β€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β β€β€Œβ β€Œβ€‹β€Œβ€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€β€β€Œβ€β€β€β€Œβ β€β€β€Œβ€β β β€‹β€β β€Œβ€Œβ β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€‹β β€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β β€Œβ€‹β€‹

I’ve had better luck pulling high‑res controller data (ATSPM) to set actual β€˜g/C’ and offsets in Synchro before deciding if a microsim is worth it; it often flips the call when timings have drifted. @jackson4243, do you use ATSPM or stick to quick field checks?

β€Œβ β€β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ β€Œβ€β€‹β β€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ β€‹β€‹β€Œβ€β β€‹β€Œβ β€β€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€Œβ€‹β€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β β€Œβ€‹β€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€Œβ β β€‹β β€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€Œβ β€Œβ€β€‹β€Œβ€Œβ€β β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€β€‹β€Œβ€β β€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€Œβ€Œβ β€β€‹β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€Œβ€Œβ€β€β€Œβ€β€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β β€β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β β€Œβ€‹β€‹

@sjohns19 +1 on the workflow; one step I add is matching Synchro’s time-space diagram to probe travel times (INRIX/CV) so cruise speed/offsets line up β€” if I need >5–7 s tweaks, I fix that first and only then consider microsim (measure twice, simulate once). FHWA’s guidance backs this kind of screening: Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume III: Guidelines for Applying Traffic Microsimulation Modeling Software β€” do you calibrate driver aggressiveness in VISSIM from video or leave defaults?

β€Œβ β€β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ β€Œβ€β€‹β β€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ β€‹β€‹β€Œβ€β β€‹β€Œβ β€β€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€Œβ€‹β€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β β€Œβ€‹β€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β β β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€Œβ€Œβ€β€β€‹β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€‹β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β β€Œβ β€β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€β€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ β€‹β β€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ β€β€‹β€‹β β€‹β€β€Œβ€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β β€Œβ€‹β€‹